From the official site of Dr.Stephan Lanka. https://rotekartefuercorona.de/
Link to the original page; https://rotekartefuercorona.de/drei-rote-karten.php
(From the site of Dr. Stephan Lanka, Ph.D. Translated from the German. I translated this on Google Translate. Obviously, there will sections with which you will need time to understand. So grammatical errors will be present. Read over again twice or thrice to fully comprehend. Until we get a proper German to English translation done.)
for CORONA
by Dr.Stephan Lanka, Ph.D
There is no emperor, just his clothes.
How to protect yourself and others
For those who believe in viruses, the corona measures appear in principle sensible, perhaps exaggerated and therefore annoying. For a minority of the population who know or sense that there is something fundamental in claims about viruses, Infection theories and vaccinations are incorrect or may not be correct, the coronavirus stressful hysteria. For those who already understand that there is a better explanation for Diseases and life, the corona crisis is an opportunity for everyone: for one Leap in development in people's self-confidence.
The implementation started and the prospect of direct or indirect mandatory vaccination Using so-called genetic vaccines is a threat to everyone who is used to forces constructive action. Corona vaccines contain permanently toxic ones mRNA in high concentration. mRNA is the name for active nucleic acids for Formation of proteins. Natural mRNA is never free in organisms. In the least Amounts only in very specific places where proteins are needed and is broken down again immediately after use. Technically produced mRNA builds up slowly from. It can permanently insert itself into our chromosomes, damaging them and with it our descendants. The administration of artificial mRNA, no matter what kind, calls ALWAYS derailed inflammatory reactions and allergies in the body. Never a therapy based on the use of mRNA worked, on the contrary. The Effects were always “side effects” fraught with fatality.
These are all long known knowledge of toxicology. As an alleged transport aid of the mRNA from the implantation site in the muscle to the Toxic nanoparticles are used in target locations, the cell nuclei throughout the body. The reason why they are so poisonous is that they have a huge surface area in relation to their volume, accelerate chemical reactions. This is known as catalysis. In the body, nanoparticles are persistently toxic, because they are slow to none be broken down and excreted. Nanoparticles are mainly for that Damage to the blood and nervous system, the brain and the liver are responsible. The combination effects of mRNA and nanoparticles increase the toxicity of the individual substances. The increasing combination effects of both substances have a negative effect in the body wherever they are individually random and unpredictable reach. Their respective mono and combination effects are considered side effects of vaccines belittled, although they are the only options and therefore the Main effect of these vaccines are. With knowledge of real biology and biochemistry vaccines cannot have a positive effect. The historical proof: Definable Individual diseases that should be prevented by vaccinations have always been at the low levels they were in today, before the vaccines were used. i What our politicians are only slowly realizing is the statement of the corona vaccine Manufacturers that the corona vaccines do NOT protect against a (supposed) infection and DO NOT protect against the alleged virus being passed on.
The politicians hoped before Bundestag elections in September this year using genetic engineering, which they already have Subsidized for decades as an alleged future technology with billions, the Celebrating victory over the virus. But because the GM vaccines are not available It is concluded that we should protect against infection despite complete vaccination coverage the population for a long time, maybe forever with the mask and the others Having to live with limitations. Politicians demand to be bogged down in their coercive logic and to be able to save face that corona vaccinations from different manufacturers have to be vaccinated one after the other in order to, perhaps, hopefully by chance, if we're lucky, and especially if the virus doesn't mutate too much, in the future at least get a little more "vaccination protection".
The Federal Minister of Health of the FRG, Jens Spahn, is therefore planning to buy 300 million vaccine doses for the 83 million inhabitants of Germany, so everyone can and should be vaccinated at least four times. The foreseeable results Massive damage to health from the corona vaccinations, in combination with the lockdown effects are foreseeable to overwhelm the already lead a pre-damaged economy. Failing economic power automatically leads to Public order collapse. There is therefore an urgent need for action about the likely collapse of our civilization by the historically to avoid the foreseeable self-success of the corona hysteria. And about Corona to be used as an opportunity for everyone.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The beginning of an action is outlined here, as you, the readers of the Magazins w +, your families, acquaintances, friends and others first personally protect against this threat and thus automatically protect the corona crisis as a unique one Opportunity for everyone to be able to use. The emperor is not naked, he does not exist. Just the fear before him, the supposedly insidious and contagious evil from nature Terrible, real, dominant and old: this fear is the result of the 2500 year old Good-bad materialism of our culture, the development of which we made comprehensible to have. By looking at existing knowledge together, we can create a better one Offer understanding of life and its phenomena. iii Plato and his disciple Socrates pointed out the central misconception of materialism and its consequences. iv Seamus O‘Mahony, in his 2019 book “Can Medicine be cured?
The Corruption of a Profession ”on page 262 indicates that there is also this point of view Health / diseases exist, but so far had no chance to be applied. v It is no longer about (as with the previous small-small actions since 1995) to ask the virus evidence question to those responsible. That is finished. It is proven and easily verifiable that all virologists since 1954 have found themselves and mislead the public with seven major misconceptions. They give virus Assumptions as alleged evidence of their existence. That starts that Virologists the death of cells in the test tube as evidence AND as isolation of viruses interpret. Then they interpret typical components of dying cells in the test tube as Components of viruses and only use them to construct mental models of viruses and their alleged genetic material strands. The structures that appear in the electron microscope as Viruses released are normal components of dying cells. Such "Viruses" have never been seen in a person or his fluids, from there isolated or their alleged genetic material detected as a whole. For your definitive reassurance: It can be disease-causing viruses if you know the real ones Biology does not give.
The real causes of illness are known and have to do with nothing to do with material contagion. vi If you do this for the “Red Card for Corona "research, you will be rewarded with another and certain insight: All virologists - not only for Corona - have come to terms with their own statements in seven central points themselves refuted. vii The quickest and easiest fact for you to check and determine which you will come to in your research is clear evidence of the anti Scientific quality of ALL virologists. It is a written duty of everyone Scientist to constantly question himself and others, to question everything. Nevertheless, virologists have the mandatory control tests Never review their methods and not for a single step of their doing carried out or published. Therefore, no statements by virologists are allowed as be scientifically evaluated. All Corona measures are based on the Infection Protection Act (IfSG) and are - but only if the law is fulfilled (sic!) - justified thereby. §1 IfSG subjects everyone Participants of the scientific community. Since this scientific approach is a prerequisite for the corona measures are not in place AND the statements of the virologists are clear are refuted, all Corona measures lose their validity and justification.
More Still: All Corona measures are illegal by establishing these facts become. It's that simple. Here the binding laws, since the determination of the anti The scientific nature of the virologists and the refutation of all their claims. Consequence: The red card for the actions and claims of the virologists and for them Corona measures. The mistake of the bosses (= sovereigns) of our state, so ours Mistake, mistake of the population, was, the virologists and the central basis of Corona, not to question the existence of a corona virus. trust is good, but constant control and constant questioning is better. It is the most important Duty of a citizen, but also of a scientist.
Concrete
I now ask that you read these factual statements yourself and on the basis of the two for check relevant publications for the corona virus. viii Our Book on Corona (see quotation 2), our texts on the history of virology ix, our Videos x and the very important text collection of Corona_Fakten xi and their extensive "FAQs" that answers all your questions. If you after the review These facts-naming is safe, you can get started and Corona the red one Show map.
How? I suggest that you put these facts under the guidance of your competent Inform the health department in writing by registered mail with a reply card. in the Cover, letters request the management of the health department to inform all employees about this To inform facts. You can ask the health department to provide these facts- Immediately check designations for what the scientifically trained and certified specialists of the health authorities only need a few moments. More time are required by the highly paid experts in the health authorities for reading the "Materials & Methods" part of the two relevant publications on Corona is not.
You can give the head of the health department a short notice of one week within which you ask them to publicly return all corona measures take to stop testing and, above all, vaccination immediately. If you have a Set deadline, the notification that failure to meet the deadline is only useful as evidence for the correctness of your statements and your immediate release from all coronavirus Action can mean. You can do this scientifically comprehensively Trained specialists to inform you that you reserve the right to report it to the police for abuse of office, interference with the fundamental rights of education, freedom, property, Parental rights, dignity, the right to life and physical integrity and Involvement in manslaughter. With your message this easily and quickly No health department employee can rely on verifiable facts pull back, they would have known nothing and suspected nothing.
You can inform the head of the health department that for you personally, from now on, with this letter, all corona measures no longer apply and can apply. Ask the management of your health department to give you the Correctness of your factual findings and the resulting exemption from all Corona measures - because their assumed scientific justification has clearly ceased to exist - to be confirmed in writing and within the deadline.
Ask the health department, the responsible regulatory authority the omission of all corona Communicate actions and commitments for you, your family, and all citizens in order to save the unnecessary effort and the costs for this immediately as well.
Further procedure and intermediate goals
I would like to record all letters and replies from the “Red Card for Corona” campaign publish on the Internet. This to the admissions of the health authorities Evidence of all coronavirus allegations and measures in public and the to make accessible to the interested public. For this you and we evaluate the Responses to the cover letters and thereby optimize our further procedure. The goal: The self-destructive momentum of virus superstition in one Understanding biology and transforming our history.
I ask you to post your letters and the resulting letters of reply on ours publish the website www.rotekartefuercorona.de specially set up for this purpose, as soon as you get an answer. Please scan your cover letter and the received one Write and upload these files using the input option. We evaluate Your letter, whether your address is correct, and then activate the documents. We write to us personally or as a group of active people via email Have suggestions for improvement for the resulting answers or further ideas. Of course, we will answer your questions that arise from what you do when you are in get stuck in this matter at info@rotekartefürcorona.de. We offer the Possibility that you network with each other. To those who take action we offer to give "questions and answers" via online video.
It is to be expected that some health authorities will have the competence of the Do not trust and trust your decision about your factual specification and request Pass on the letter to the competent authority at the federal state level. Scan it also such processes, so that all the active and we such possible excuses get to know them in order to anticipate them in future entries and also these Evaluate excuses during the work-up AFTER the end of the corona panic can.
I do not provide standardized cover letters, as these are usually rejected across the board and be ignored. The "Red Card for Corona" is particularly effective through its individuality Of your understanding and reasoning. The “red card” hits the executing and responsible actors of the epidemic fear policy at the grassroots level. It is foreseeable that in the processing of Corona, as in the wall rifle trials, the perpetrators the basis "as the last link in the chain of command" is again called to account become. Perhaps these "last links in the chain of command" have from history learned and do not allow themselves again to be like the one to be protected Population, "burned up" out of sheer madness and sheer greed for power, by the Corona Measures damaged and damaged by extremely toxic and senseless vaccinations, to be made sterile and killed. So please, get on with the creative work. Please stay please always be friendly and leave the emotions to those who go unchecked Believe the existence of the virus. This is a prerequisite for participating in this campaign and a prerequisite for our success.
THE SEVEN ARGUMENTS
Here are summarized the seven main arguments about what virologists do and why they each refute themselves. Every single argument and that Those working in the laboratory refute the whole of virology for itself. The fact that every single one of the seven arguments of the virologists is missing the control experiments that are in the Science is prescribed in order to be allowed to call something scientific, individually refutes the claim of virology to be scientific. Since the Scientific basis was never given, by your finding this fact at the same moment the legal basis for all corona measures withdrawn. Your red card is the green traffic light for life and our future viability.
1. Virologists interpret the death of cells in the laboratory as viral. You overlooked due to a lack of control tests that they have the cells in the laboratory itself and to kill unintentionally, by starvation and poisoning. There is one reason for this misinterpretation based on the only publication by John Franklin Enders and a colleague dated June 1, 1954. This publication was decided by the highest court in the measles virus trial, that there is no evidence of a virus in it. This publication was made for exclusive basis not only of measles virology but the entire virology since 1954 and the corona hysteria.
2. Virologists mentally put the shortest bits of so-called genetic information of dying cells, theoretically / mathematically, into a very long genetic strand together, which they pass off as the genetic strand of a virus. This conceptual/computational process is called alignment. They have that Control attempts not carried out, the attempt to make even short pieces of so-called. Hereditary information from non-infected sources, the desired genetic strand to construct mentally / arithmetically.
3. Virologists always need a predefined one for the alignment of a virus Genetic strand of a virus. But you always only use one for this conceptually / computationally generated genome strand and never a real one, one in the Found reality. You never try to check whether the existing record so-called genetic information also constructs “viral” genetic material strands of completely different viruses might or might not be.
4. Virologists never have "viruses" in humans, animals, plants, or their fluids seen or isolated from it. You only have it apparently, indirectly, and always only by means very special and artificial cell systems done in the laboratory. You never have that Control attempts are mentioned or documented, whether they are the representation and the isolation of viruses also succeeded in and out of humans, animals, plants or their fluids is.
5. Virologists have those supposed viruses that they mean Photographing electron microscope images, never in isolation, biochemically characterized or their supposed genetic material derived from it. You never have Control experiments made or published, whether after the isolation of these structures also actually “viral” proteins (the shell of the virus) and above all the viral ones Genetic strand could be detected, which is the central component and To represent a characteristic of a virus.
6. Virologists give typical artifacts of dying tissues/cells and typical structures, those used when swirling the cell's own components such as proteins, fats and those Solvents arise as viruses or as viral components. They are also missing here Control experiments with cells/tissues that were not infected but were treated in the same way.
7. The so-called transmission attempts that virologists make to ensure the transferability and To prove the pathogenicity of the suspected viruses disproves the whole of virology. Obviously, it is the attempts themselves that trigger the symptoms that im Animal experiment as proof of the existence and the effect of the suspected viruses issued. Here, too, there are no control attempts in which exactly that The same is done, only with non-infected or sterilized materials.
FOR BETTER UNDRESTANDING
On all essential points for understanding and responsible action within the "Red Card For Corona" campaign we have in the sources pointed out. Here I would like you to better understand and understand the what has already been said, on the significance of that refutation of virology by itself point out how it was published in 1999. Knowing this, you can and others more easily understand why and how an unjustified, unscientific Award of a Nobel Prize on December 10th, 1954, the scientifically refuted virology revived. This resurgence of something refuted led to the HIV / AIDS mass killings xii, tens of epidemics and pandemics, millions of times that Burning cattle because of "BSE", the killing of millions of animals because of the various "influenza" panic reactions and above all because of the unquestioned and pointless vaccination campaigns in our history, direct and foreseeable to the sure-fire success of collective corona hysteria.
By 1954, the representatives of the various doctrines were within of virology agrees that there is no scientific evidence as to what a Virus is supposed to be, how it could be constructed, how its existence is scientifically supposed prove it. The adherents of different opinions as to what viruses should be had refuted himself thoroughly and scientifically correct. That's in the review "On the history of early virus research" of the Max Planck Institute for The history of science from 1999 has been comprehensively presented. xiii
By 1954 there were two major doctrinal opinions within virology as to what a virus was should. The "prevailing" doctrine in medicine until 1954 assumed that viruses are poisonous proteins. These protein toxins should be like the supposedly toxic toxins of Bacteria, cause disease and thereby spread by themselves multiply. Until 1952 it was firmly believed that the assumed Genetic substance of life consists of pure protein and the adopted protein viruses can therefore reproduce themselves. The other of the two large and experimentally refuted doctrines assumed that viruses are purely genetic are active elements that would act differently than protein toxins. It was believed that these types of viruses are sometimes dangerous and sometimes helpful to the Heredity and thus diseases but also resistance to diseases could generate. But since it was taught at the time that there is only sexual inheritance If there were multiplication and the viruses were not allowed sexuality, this virus had Model has no chance of recognition from opinion leaders in science.
How mini-spores became a model for viruses
In 1952 it was proven that proteins cannot multiply directly, but for theirs Formation that need the help of a nucleic acid. This proof meant the definitive Refutation of protein toxin virology and its virus models. With this observation one believed above all to have proven that the long sought and suspected The genetic material of life would exist in the form of nucleic acid DNA. This assumption again was refuted by 2001. xiv The discovery of the need for Nucleic acid for the production of proteins was found in bacteria when these form mini-spores due to adverse living conditions.
Because these mini-spores were misinterpreted as phages as viruses of the bacteria, the Virology a new way of imagining how the presumed and in the future too discovering viruses could look like and are built up. But virologists have them Structures and a specific nucleic acid, as always occurs in minispores, never found. That is why they construct models of long nucleic acids purely mentally, from real fragments of dying cells. Typical structures of dying cells in the Electron microscopes are misinterpreted as viruses, although these structures never biochemically characterized or from it the viral genetic material strand, the viral genome was isolated.
The virologists overlooked the fact that the mini-spores of the bacteria are not viruses because they have no negative functions whatsoever. Even so, these became mini-spores to the model of the entire virology until today, what in the reason for the Nobel Prize 1969 for the mini-spore phage researchers xv can be read. The minispores are the Bacteria and those of other simple organisms known as "giant viruses" xvi will always be very easy to isolate, i.e. focus, and from everyone else To free constituents. Mini-spores are also found within their educational organisms photographed and ALL its components are regularly characterized biochemically. All minispores (misinterpreted as phages / giant viruses) are always found here Proteins and especially those for every type of mini-spore always the same length and always the same composite nucleic acid.
An unfortunate Nobel Prize turned another speculation into one scientific fact
The virology, which previously and thoroughly refuted itself, learned only by chance, indirectly and in an extremely unscientific way a rebirth: through the Awarding of the Nobel Prize in Medicine 1954 for a six years ago Observation within the old "A virus is a poisonous protein" virology! This The scientifically unjustifiable Nobel Prize has already been refuted Believe that there are viruses, could revive. This by getting through the Nobel Prize automatically one from the Nobel Prize recipient six months earlier, on June 1st, 1954 published completely different speculation to the never questioned "scientific Fact ”and this alleged fact became the basis of future virology. John Franklin Enders speculated on June 1, 1954 that it might be possible to get viruses multiply, even if you don't even know them.
Enders and his colleague believed that the death of animal tissues in the Test tube interpreted as evidence of the presence and multiplication of viruses could be. After the Nobel Prize, "the whole world" believed this and assumed that it is a scientifically proven fact. In the Publication of their speculation of 1.6.1954 xvii have Enders and his colleague explicitly and repeatedly pointed out that this dying of animal Tissues in the test tube probably have nothing to do with the processes in humans do and that unknown factors or viruses hide the death of the animal Tissue could cause. For they observed that the tissues also died even if no supposedly infected materials were placed on them by sick people. Therefore, they urged readers to keep these observations strictly and with in the future review scientific methods.
After the Nobel Prize on December 10th, 1954, these warnings were dated June 1st, 1954 forgotten and Enders claimed a little later that all future vaccine development based on exactly this speculation of 1.6.1954 would happen. That's how it actually comes to this day. A Nobel Prize made a refuted one Speculation a scientific fact that led to the the resurgence of the disproved Virology led, and as a direct consequence to Corona.
That the speculation of June 1st, 1954 and the rebirth of virology are possible at all was because Enders and all virologists to date are those in science have not carried out the prescribed control tests. That's why they have and All virologists to this day overlook the fact that they are unintentionally and unnoticed the Kill tissue / cells in the test tube. By starving and poisoning with certain Antibiotics that are not only bacteria but also human, animal and vegetable Kill tissue. The ruling in the measles virus trial has become final The entire virology is deprived of its scientific and thus its legal basis. It was established at all three levels of the court and confirmed that the publication von Enders of 1.6.1954 does not contain any evidence of the existence of a virus.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
i See the work on this by the association www.libertas-sanitas.de
ii Ursula Stoll and Stefan Lanka: Corona. Further into chaos or opportunity for everyone. Book, 210 pages. 2nd edition, 2021. Available from wplus-verlag.de or http://www.praxis-neue-medizin-verlag.de/
iii Introduction to a New Perspective on Life Part I to III. To be found in the Issues No. 1, 2 and 3/2019 of the magazine WissenschektivenPlus. Available from wplus- verlag.de
iv Quote from Plato (427 - around 348 BC), Latin Plato, Greek philosopher, student of Socrates: “Just as one shouldn't undertake to heal the eyes without the head, yet the head without the whole body, so also not the body without the soul; but this one this would also be the reason why doctors do most of the Hellenes Diseases would not have grown because they misunderstood the whole thing which one ought to take care of, and when it is ill, it is impossible any part might be well. Because everything [...] springs from the soul, evil and good to the body and to the whole person, and flow from there to him as from the head to the eyes. " Source: Plato, Charmides, created around 380 BC. Chr. 156e. Translated by Friedrich Schleiermacher
v The physician and author Seamus O’Mahony, whose book, published in 2019 "Can Medicine Be Cured? The Corruption of a Profession “(translated: Can medicine be cured? The corruption of a profession) comes to a grim prognosis: out In his view, only a humanitarian catastrophe can bring about a reform of medicine.
vi Giuliana Lüssi: Universal biology - a way of life. Book, 180 pages. 2. Edition, 2021. Available from wplus-verlag.de or praxis-neue-medizin.de
vii Stefan Lanka: The perpetrators of the Corona crisis are clearly identified. Virologists who claim disease-causing viruses are science frauds and prosecute. Article in the magazine WissenschektivenPlus 4/2020. To acquire via wplus-verlag.de This post is free on the internet at wissenschektivenplus.de, here at Find “Important Texts”.
viii A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 579: 265-269 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3. In this publication is the first conceptual / computational construction of the genetic strand (= genome) of SARS-CoV-2 described. This calculated genome became the exclusive template for everyone subsequent constructions, in which only what was repeated with this work was specified. This work did not appear online until 3.2.2020, which gives the impression arouses that the second work on this (see below), which was published earlier apparently originated independently of each other. This is not the case: the in of this first work mentally / calculated gene sequence was previously on 10.1.2020 published on the Internet and thus become a model and template of what SARS-CoV-2 should be should.
The second scientific publication on the new corona virus, with which the conceptual / computational construction of the viral genome confirmed in the first work and was supplemented by electron microscope images of the "virus": A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 727- 33. DOI: 10.1056 / NEJ-Moa2001017. Published online in advance on January 24th, 2020.
ix Stefan Lanka: misinterpretation virus. Part 1 (in SciencePlus 1/2020) and Part II (in SciencePlus 2/2020). The contribution "Misinterpretation Virus Part II" is free on the Internet at wissenschaffplus.de, to be found here under “Important texts”.
x See "projekt-immanuel.de" and the Youtube channel "Dean's Danes"
xi See "Corona_Fakten" on the Internet provider Telegram, which is available as an app for mobile devices and PCs there.
xii To get an idea of how HIV / AIDS is still killing today, I recommend the film, freely available on the internet: “I wont go quietly! by Anne Sono who are also gained a positive name for home schooling through her commitment and films has made.
xiii Karlheinz Lüdtke: On the history of early virus research. How to deal with technical advances in the study of "filterable" infectious agents Understanding of the nature of viruses. Reprint No. 125 (1999) of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, 89 pages.
xiv When attempting to study human DNA, only these came up Refutations of all models of heredity and the role of DNA. Please refer the article "Erbgut in Dissolution" in DIE ZEIT from June 12, 2008, which is free on the Internet can be found. See our numerous articles about "genetic engineering" in the Magazine w + (SciencePlus).
xv See the rationale for the 1969 Nobel Prize to the phage group nobelprize.org
xvi See vii
xvii "Enders, J.F. & Peebles, T.C. (1954) Propagation in tissue cultures of cytopathogenic agents from patients with measles. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 86 (2): 277-286. "To be found at: https://pubmedinfo.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/propagation-in-tissue-cultures-of- cytopathogenic-agents-from-patients-with-measles.pdf
